Make pve servers happen.

5 minutes ago, Deathz Angel said:

Make pve servers happen.

Yes raise the awareness lol

I think you already got your answer: The same thread for PvE servers in the XBox section was deleted or archived tonight by a CM. Therefore, expect a PvE server will never come and this question also wants not to be discussed by a CM or PM ?

8 hours ago, Mihari said:

I think you already got your answer: The same thread for PvE servers in the XBox section was deleted or archived tonight by a CM. Therefore, expect a PvE server will never come and this question also wants not to be discussed by a CM or PM ?

Well as you can see the devs at Blizzard told us the consumer for years that we didn't want classic wow and for years the community kept telling them yes we do. Long story short they lost many subs until lo and behold they tried our suggestion and now there are more people playing classic than retail. If PA wants more players they might want to wake up and listen to the community about Pve servers.

On 10/7/2019 at 1:13 PM, Deathz Angel said:

Fine do it come on already reduce the drop rate idc but PvP is so stupid. The grind is what you keep referencing back to, so we have to grind a little longer its worth the sacrifice to get trash PvP away from me. Im sure many people would not mind drop rate decreases if it means no more PvP for specific servers.

You're also going to have a bunch of people in the same spot trying to grind and none of you will be able to grind successfully 

1 hour ago, Linxz said:

You're also going to have a bunch of people in the same spot trying to grind and none of you will be able to grind successfully 

Wrong you can only speculate what you think would happen.

13 hours ago, Mihari said:

I think you already got your answer: The same thread for PvE servers in the XBox section was deleted or archived tonight by a CM. Therefore, expect a PvE server will never come and this question also wants not to be discussed by a CM or PM ?

Yeah it was my pve post that got deleted.. they really dont know what we want.. smh

On 10/7/2019 at 8:29 AM, SoloTyrant said:

You have no way of proving that. 

Also as the CMs mentioned that the reduced danger would mean reduced drops. 

 

 

Yes but at least you wont have to worry about some guy coming along wiping the floor with you lmao

1 hour ago, q Hephaestus p said:

 

Yes but at least you wont have to worry about some guy coming along wiping the floor with you lmao

I don't worry about that anyway. All that can happen is I win or lose some random fight. Either way, I change servers to find a less busy rotation. I can generally get a couple hours a day in Arsha on PC without being bothered. 

The bigger issue is there just being a bunch of people in my way. They never even have to flag up and they are ruining my grinding session. Last night at Nagas was particularly bad on PS4. 0 pvpping but the spot was full of people killing npcs making my guild mission take longer. 

Taking away pvp won't make grinding better.  You'd still need to swap channels if the spot gets busy.  Removing pvp wouldn't fix the core issue for grinding. Yes, you are less scared but you are spending more time for less rewards. 

1 hour ago, Deathz Angel said:

Wrong you can only speculate what you think would happen.

It is perfectly fitting though. 

You people are asking for a pve server, right? 

If a grind spot on that server gets busy then what are your options? Keep in mind that you now are 50+ because you got a pve server. You can't just switch to a pvp enabled server and be happy since that is your problem now. Yet, you can't get rid of the pve'ers grinding where you are. 

33 minutes ago, SoloTyrant said:

It is perfectly fitting though. 

You people are asking for a pve server, right? 

If a grind spot on that server gets busy then what are your options? Keep in mind that you now are 50+ because you got a pve server. You can't just switch to a pvp enabled server and be happy since that is your problem now. Yet, you can't get rid of the pve'ers grinding where you are. 

There's no problem you know how dense the mobs are and how fast they spawn your argument is futile. If they make a pve server why would anyone want to switch. 

1 hour ago, Deathz Angel said:

There's no problem you know how dense the mobs are and how fast they spawn your argument is futile. If they make a pve server why would anyone want to switch. 

You don't read. 

1 hour ago, SoloTyrant said:

You don't read. 

Pvers are more courteous than pvpers from my experiences in games. 

2 hours ago, SoloTyrant said:

I don't worry about that anyway. All that can happen is I win or lose some random fight. Either way, I change servers to find a less busy rotation. I can generally get a couple hours a day in Arsha on PC without being bothered. 

The bigger issue is there just being a bunch of people in my way. They never even have to flag up and they are ruining my grinding session. Last night at Nagas was particularly bad on PS4. 0 pvpping but the spot was full of people killing npcs making my guild mission take longer. 

Taking away pvp won't make grinding better.  You'd still need to swap channels if the spot gets busy.  Removing pvp wouldn't fix the core issue for grinding. Yes, you are less scared but you are spending more time for less rewards. 

Yes but having to not worry about pvp battles is always nice and yeah I understand that part but ps4 doesnt have the full map and neither does xbox, so far on xbox I dont get pvp'd alot there are plenty of grind spots.. the map is huge lol I dont like having to grind a little part of an area and getting someone who thinks they own the entire grind area and pvp everyone they come across. The karma system doesnt discourage anyone from pvp so it doesnt make sense to see everything in funnel vision and putting up with forced pvp. Either way when ever another mmorpg comes out I may just leave bdo behind lol. It's a good game dont get me wrong it's just that 1 feature that gives the game a huge disadvantage to other games. 

13 hours ago, q Hephaestus p said:

Yes but having to not worry about pvp battles is always nice and yeah I understand that part but ps4 doesnt have the full map and neither does xbox, so far on xbox I dont get pvp'd alot there are plenty of grind spots.. the map is huge lol I dont like having to grind a little part of an area and getting someone who thinks they own the entire grind area and pvp everyone they come across. The karma system doesnt discourage anyone from pvp so it doesnt make sense to see everything in funnel vision and putting up with forced pvp. Either way when ever another mmorpg comes out I may just leave bdo behind lol. It's a good game dont get me wrong it's just that 1 feature that gives the game a huge disadvantage to other games. 

Like I said. You remove one fear. 

Regardless of how big the game is on PC when compared to PS4/Xbox, you aren't necessarily trying to grind all mobs at any given time. You may have missions for a mob or want items from a specific mob or marni stones etc. 

So on a PvE server there wouldn't be pvp but could still suffer from crowding with little to no way of getting around the slower grind unless you channel hop to a normal server. 

This request gives you people fewer options and less items. 

5 hours ago, SoloTyrant said:

Like I said. You remove one fear. 

Regardless of how big the game is on PC when compared to PS4/Xbox, you aren't necessarily trying to grind all mobs at any given time. You may have missions for a mob or want items from a specific mob or marni stones etc. 

So on a PvE server there wouldn't be pvp but could still suffer from crowding with little to no way of getting around the slower grind unless you channel hop to a normal server. 

 

This request gives you people fewer options and less items. 

It does not give less options or items it just gives you pvpers less targets to harass that's why you don't want it your servers would be like ghost town more than it already is lol.

On 10/6/2019 at 5:44 PM, Deathz Angel said:

We do need pve server zero PvP allowed and then the game would have a bigger player base. 

Even if the became a discussion for concept, a pve only server would have to be completely isolated (no server hopping, merging of CM) from every other server with a completely different path the game would need to take in terms of content. If anyone thinks pvp is just a "flavor" for this game, you would quickly realize how flavorless everything else is in terms of classes, depth of fighting mechanics, desire to obtain and upgrade weapons/armor/accessories, grinding mobs. You may as well just have a game with just 1 class with an AoE and hp/resource recovery ability just to life skill items that will barely sell since there is no purpose to obtain them from someone else.

I can think of numerous positive/dynamic changes pvp has played a fundamental role in.

Can you think of one thing aside from peace of mind that is positive if you take this element out?

So either this is a troll post and someone needs to close this, or just stay at level 49 and you get all the perks from the economy from your life-skilling gameplay with none of the pvp "flavor" and still be able to be your true self. Honestly awakening/succession content isnt even needed if all you're doing is life skilling and aoe grinding.

8 minutes ago, Baines said:

Even if the became a discussion for concept, a pve only server would have to be completely isolated (no server hopping, merging of CM) from every other server with a completely different path the game would need to take in terms of content. If anyone thinks pvp is just a "flavor" for this game, you would quickly realize how flavorless everything else is in terms of classes, depth of fighting mechanics, desire to obtain and upgrade weapons/armor/accessories, grinding mobs. You may as well just have a game with just 1 class with an AoE and hp/resource recovery ability just to life skill items that will barely sell since there is no purpose to obtain them from someone else.

I can think of numerous positive/dynamic changes pvp has played a fundamental role in.

Can you think of one thing aside from peace of mind that is positive if you take this element out?

So either this is a troll post and someone needs to close this, or just stay at level 49 and you get all the perks from the economy from your life-skilling gameplay with none of the pvp "flavor" and still be able to be your true self. Honestly awakening/succession content isnt even needed if all you're doing is life skilling and aoe grinding.

???? All we can do is guess what the option for pve servers would do to the game there is no actual stats for this option and I'm 100% sure that they wouldn't segregate the whole game by pve players and pvp players people and all their THEORIES are just what they think will happen. People like you limit this game to only PVP. I dont like to bring up ESO but they do it just fine I'm sure the dev's of bdo can figure out how to work these types of game styles into the game.. And if you disagree tough luck man.

1 hour ago, q Hephaestus p said:

???? All we can do is guess what the option for pve servers would do to the game there is no actual stats for this option and I'm 100% sure that they wouldn't segregate the whole game by pve players and pvp players people and all their THEORIES are just what they think will happen. People like you limit this game to only PVP. I dont like to bring up ESO but they do it just fine I'm sure the dev's of bdo can figure out how to work these types of game styles into the game.. And if you disagree tough luck man.

This isn't theory though. 

This is how we play the game on all servers right now. 

If it's crowded then you switch channels, try to chase people away, or stay in the crowded area until you're done with your mission or farm. 

If you are farming elites, ogres, rares, mushrooms, lobsters, coral, erc then you have to switch channels at the end of the each rotation.

Removing pvp doesn't change the above issues or how already play the game. 

PA already said less danger = less items. So when you're grinding a rotation on the pve server and it's crowded or you have to reset the area then your options are wait or change channels. The former is a big waste of time and the latter is you going back to pvp enabled channels. 

You people are the ones asking for a theoretical situation without wanting to acknowledge all the matters your one change would mean.  

If I disagree tough luck? Dude. This dud of an idea has been passed on PC for years.  The tough luck is you late to the party console gamers that think your new tears are new. 

2 hours ago, q Hephaestus p said:

???? All we can do is guess what the option for pve servers would do to the game there is no actual stats for this option and I'm 100% sure that they wouldn't segregate the whole game by pve players and pvp players people and all their THEORIES are just what they think will happen. People like you limit this game to only PVP. I dont like to bring up ESO but they do it just fine I'm sure the dev's of bdo can figure out how to work these types of game styles into the game.. And if you disagree tough luck man.

I'm not sure what part of my post triggered you to categorize me as one of "those" people. Allow me to clarify.

Most the arguments I've seen here, including my own, are refuting the need to justify a pve only server with very tangible issues that would take a significant amount of effort to implement for a not so clear # of playerbase, for issues that can be easily be solved with just staying at lv 49, moving servers, asking guildies for help. To brush off the idea of potential issues, instead of actually considering them, is condescending/ignorant and shows your lack of respect to the engagement.

Of all the years I've seen this game active in, the voices calling for a pure pve only server is minimal. If you want this to be a thing, you'll need more than just a few stray of posters saying "hey, I only pve. Make it happen" you'll need a big enough following to get a business' attention. There has to be a justification or something more tangible than a few cry posts about griefers before anyone would consider this idea that will make PA more money.

8 minutes ago, Baines said:

I'm not sure what part of my post triggered you to categorize me as one of "those" people. Allow me to clarify.

 

Most the arguments I've seen here, including my own, are refuting the need to justify a pve only server with very tangible issues that would take a significant amount of effort to implement for a not so clear # of playerbase, for issues that can be easily be solved with just staying at lv 49, moving servers, asking guildies for help. To brush off the idea of potential issues, instead of actually considering them, is condescending/ignorant and shows your lack of respect to the engagement.

 

Of all the years I've seen this game active in, the voices calling for a pure pve only server is minimal. If you want this to be a thing, you'll need more than just a few stray of posters saying "hey, I only pve. Make it happen" you'll need a big enough following to get a business' attention. There has to be a justification or something more tangible than a few cry posts about griefers before anyone would consider this idea that will make PA more money.

If I could like your comment a hundred times I would 

12 minutes ago, Baines said:

I'm not sure what part of my post triggered you to categorize me as one of "those" people. Allow me to clarify.

 

Most the arguments I've seen here, including my own, are refuting the need to justify a pve only server with very tangible issues that would take a significant amount of effort to implement for a not so clear # of playerbase, for issues that can be easily be solved with just staying at lv 49, moving servers, asking guildies for help. To brush off the idea of potential issues, instead of actually considering them, is condescending/ignorant and shows your lack of respect to the engagement.

 

Of all the years I've seen this game active in, the voices calling for a pure pve only server is minimal. If you want this to be a thing, you'll need more than just a few stray of posters saying "hey, I only pve. Make it happen" you'll need a big enough following to get a business' attention. There has to be a justification or something more tangible than a few cry posts about griefers before anyone would consider this idea that will make PA more money.

Soooooooo your not open to the idea of a PVE server? ?

7 hours ago, Baines said:

I'm not sure what part of my post triggered you to categorize me as one of "those" people. Allow me to clarify.

 

Most the arguments I've seen here, including my own, are refuting the need to justify a pve only server with very tangible issues that would take a significant amount of effort to implement for a not so clear # of playerbase, for issues that can be easily be solved with just staying at lv 49, moving servers, asking guildies for help. To brush off the idea of potential issues, instead of actually considering them, is condescending/ignorant and shows your lack of respect to the engagement.

 

Of all the years I've seen this game active in, the voices calling for a pure pve only server is minimal. If you want this to be a thing, you'll need more than just a few stray of posters saying "hey, I only pve. Make it happen" you'll need a big enough following to get a business' attention. There has to be a justification or something more tangible than a few cry posts about griefers before anyone would consider this idea that will make PA more money.

Pour this man a large beer! 

It's literally 3 people here constantly whining about it, one of them even claims he's been 49 since March. SIGH

Nonetheless, its' been confirmed pve servers won't happen so yeah, we are safe. 

Thanks for your input man. 

12 hours ago, Rocketfuel77777 said:

Pour this man a large beer! 

It's literally 3 people here constantly whining about it, one of them even claims he's been 49 since March. SIGH

Nonetheless, its' been confirmed pve servers won't happen so yeah, we are safe. 

Thanks for your input man. 

I am 49 on multiple toons and have been since beta and will continue to actively ask for pve server.

2 hours ago, Deathz Angel said:

I am 49 on multiple toons and have been since beta and will continue to actively ask for pve server.

I'm with you on that lol all these close minded people is sad they dismiss the idea before it's a thing ? I will actively ask for pve servers as well someone has to say something.

Yeah, „something” has already been said by PA “no pve servers”.

You both should get banned for flooding the forums with spam.

4 hours ago, Rocketfuel77777 said:

Yeah, „something” has already been said by PA “no pve servers”.

You both should get banned for flooding the forums with spam.

We can talk about what we want to have in a game we paid for, that's what forum's are for if you don't like what we discuss then look away. 

On 10/11/2019 at 5:07 PM, q Hephaestus p said:

I'm with you on that lol all these close minded people is sad they dismiss the idea before it's a thing ? I will actively ask for pve servers as well someone has to say something.

Who is being close minded here? A PVE server would just be one  server I didn't use. It wouldn't bother me in anyway. 
However, I've been in this conversation for years before the game came to console. PA's concern and balance style for a PVE-only server is never addressed by those asking for PVE-only servers. Maybe if someone came up with a plan and concessions that would make such a sever viable then maybe PA would do something about it.

At this point you people are just saying "We have the right to voice our opinion". Yes, you do. 
You should figure out how to turn your opinion into something actionable.

So as im reading through this ive come to realize that 1. yes alot of ppl would want pve servers 2. itll never happen 3. pkers should be punished in some way. As of right now the game encourages ppl to make others game experience less fun/rewarding....doesnt that kinda fall into the realm of cyber bullying and or griefing??? And here goes the flood of comments... GO!!!

6 hours ago, lonelysphinx said:

So as im reading through this ive come to realize that 1. yes alot of ppl would want pve servers 2. itll never happen 3. pkers should be punished in some way. As of right now the game encourages ppl to make others game experience less fun/rewarding....doesnt that kinda fall into the realm of cyber bullying and or griefing??? And here goes the flood of comments... GO!!!

1. The same names spam the same issues. No clue is a lot of other people agree 

2. True. 

3. The isn't much motivation pk besides wanting to be red. There is Muiquun(sp?) but you can do that killing horses. There are more negatives to being red than not. 

9 hours ago, lonelysphinx said:

So as im reading through this ive come to realize that 1. yes alot of ppl would want pve servers 2. itll never happen 3. pkers should be punished in some way. As of right now the game encourages ppl to make others game experience less fun/rewarding....doesnt that kinda fall into the realm of cyber bullying and or griefing??? And here goes the flood of comments... GO!!!

Yes a lot of people have quit this game due to horrible PvP system. If they want a thriving healthy game they would implement pve servers but not every company is smart. They encourage griefing .